Post implementation review policy for evaluating outcomes of Transport Agency investments
The NZ Transport Agency Board approved the post implementation review policy for evaluating outcomes of agency investments in July 2013. The policy is designed to promote the transparency of the review findings, improve the evaluation of expected benefits and identification of lessons learned.
Post implementation review scope
The Transport Agency uses an appropriate monitoring and auditing framework across funded activities in the National Land Transport Programme (NLTP). Post implementation reviews are part of this framework.
Their scope is on reviewing improvement projects and packages from within the following NLTP activity classes:
- new and improved state highway infrastructure
- new and improved local road infrastructure
- public transport infrastructure, and
- walking and cycling.
Purpose of post implementation reviews
Post implementation reviews aim to:
- assess and explain how well projects and packages have achieved their main expected transport benefits (such as improved safety, increased capacity to meet traffic volume growth, or improved journey time and reliability) to give an overall assessment of the value for money of completed projects or packages reviewed
- explain any variation between actual results and expected benefits and costs, and
- identify lessons learned that can be made to make business improvements.
Selection of activities for review
In order to ensure outcomes are clear, Approved Organisations are required to nominate performance measures and targets for all projects and packages with an approved cost of $10 million or more as a condition of funding. The Transport Agency may also require performance measures on some lower value activities (for example, where there is a strategic link or innovation identified).
A sample of completed projects is selected for post implementation reviews each year using a stratified sampling approach. The range of factors considered in selecting completed activities to review include:
- the value of funding
- activity type
- regional spread
- giving preference to reviewing a package of interrelated projects rather than the individual projects in isolation, and
- selecting only projects or packages that have been substantially complete for at least two years. This is to give sufficient time after their completion for meaningful assessment of how well they have achieved their expected outcomes. Safety improvement projects may require at least five years before their effect on crash statistics can be properly assessed.
Promoting the learning of lessons from completed projects
The following processes are be used to promote lessons learned from post implementation reviews:
- the relevant Approved Organisations (including the Transport Agency's Highways and Network Operations group) of reviewed projects are consulted to give them opportunity to formally comment on review findings. This includes stating how they plan to address any significant issues or improvement opportunities identified
- capable Approved Organisations are encouraged to undertake post implementation reviews themselves, consistent with this policy
- we follow up with Approved Organisations on review recommendations
- post implementation review findings are used to help inform the Agency's risk assessment of Approved Organisations
- review findings are reported quarterly, along with recommendations for any actions required to be implemented or monitored. Key findings or themes from the reviews are reported quarterly to the Transport Agency Board, but there is a provision to escalate significant review findings more frequently if required
- review findings are published on the Transport Agency website after each quarterly Board meeting, and
- the Roads of National Significance (RoNS) projects will be monitored and reviewed through an extended post implementation review process which will assess their wider social, economic, and environmental impacts.
PIRs by year
|Auckland Transport – Lake Road Widening||PDF | 14 pages | 1.4MB|
|Bay of Plenty HNO – Bethlehem Township Improvements||PDF | 16 pages | 509KB|
|Bay of Plenty HNO – Pyes Pa Bypass||PDF | 16 pages | 745KB|
|Dunedin City Council – Portobello Road at Vauxhall||PDF | 13 pages | 1.8MB|
|Hamilton City Council – Mill Street Intersection Upgrades||PDF | 12 pages | 1.0MB|
|Tasman HNO – Ruby Bay Bypass SH60||PDF | 13 pages | 1.25MB|
|Tauranga City Council – Cameron Road Cycle Lanes||PDF | 19 pages | 634KB|
|Auckland & Northland HNO – Kaingaroa Safety Improvements||PDF | 13 pages | 865KB|
|Palmerston North City Council – Railway Road Improvements||PDF | 7 pages | 447KB|
|Waikato HNO – Avalon Drive Bypass||PDF | 8 pages | 603KB|
|Waikato HNO – Mangatawhiri Deviation||PDF | 7 pages | 501KB|
|Post implementation reviews completed in 2011/12||PDF | 11 pages | 842KB|
|Northern Busway Review summary, May 2012||PDF | 8 pages | 440KB|
|Northern Busway Review report, May 2012||PDF | 32 pages | 796KB|
|Northern Busway Review annexes, May 2012||PDF | 50 pages | 1.8MB|
|Auckland Motorways - Victoria Park Tunnel||PDF | 19 pages| 1.2MB|
|The implications of road investment, November 2012||PDF | 245 pages | 3.15MB|
|Post implementation reviews completed in 2010/11||PDF | 24 pages | 1.8MB|
|Post implementation reviews completed in 2009/10||PDF | 35 pages | 1.7MB|
|Post implementation reviews completed in 2008/09||PDF | 21 pages | 119KB|